Loading...
Before 1911, physicists pictured the atom as a uniform "plum pudding" of positive charge with electrons scattered through it. A single experiment — firing alpha particles at gold foil, thinner than this page — completely overturned that model, revealing that almost all of an atom’s mass and all of its positive charge is crammed into a nucleus ten thousand times smaller than the atom itself.
What you'll be able to do
Geiger and Marsden, working under Rutherford, fired a beam of alpha particles at an extremely thin sheet of gold foil and observed where they ended up on a surrounding fluorescent screen. The vast majority of alpha particles passed straight through with little or no deflection — but a small fraction were deflected through large angles, and a tiny number bounced back almost the way they came, at angles greater than 90°.
These observations were completely inconsistent with the "plum pudding" model, in which positive charge (and mass) was spread thinly and evenly through the whole atom — such a diffuse charge distribution could never exert enough force to reverse the path of a fast, relatively heavy alpha particle. Rutherford concluded that an atom’s positive charge (and almost all its mass) must be concentrated in a tiny, dense : most alpha particles pass through the mostly-empty space around it undeflected, but the rare few travelling almost directly at a nucleus are repelled strongly enough to scatter back.
Tip — Learn the three observations as a linked set: (1) most pass straight through → atom is mostly empty space; (2) some deflect at large angles → a concentrated positive charge exists; (3) a very few bounce back → that charge (and mass) is small and dense, not spread out.
An alpha particle fired directly at a nucleus is repelled by the Coulomb force and gradually slows down as it approaches, converting kinetic energy into electric potential energy. At the point of closest approach, the alpha particle is momentarily at rest (all its initial kinetic energy has become potential energy), before being repelled back the way it came. Setting the alpha particle’s initial kinetic energy equal to the electric potential energy at this point gives an estimate — an upper limit — for the nuclear radius.
Tip — This method gives an upper limit on nuclear radius (the alpha particle turns around before reaching it exactly if the calculated distance is still larger than the true nuclear surface) — using higher-energy alpha particles, which approach closer, refines the estimate.
More detailed scattering experiments (also using high-energy electrons) show that nuclear radius depends on the nucleon number, following , where fm is approximately the same for all nuclei. This cube-root relationship means nuclear () is directly proportional to — exactly what you’d expect if every nucleon takes up roughly the same amount of space and nucleons are simply packed together, rather than being squeezed more tightly in heavier nuclei.
Because both mass and volume are proportional to , is essentially the same for every nucleus, regardless of size — and it is enormous, roughly kg m⁻³, far denser than any ordinary matter.
Tip — The A^(1/3) relationship is the single most exam-tested fact in this lesson — memorise it precisely, including that it is a CUBE root, not a square root.
Equation recap
Common mistakes to avoid
Key takeaways
Test yourself
Ready to lock in Rutherford Scattering and Nuclear Radius? Pick a mode and earn XP & Dobloons.