Loading...
Light diffracts and interferes like a wave, yet knocks electrons out of metal like a stream of particles. Louis de Broglie’s radical suggestion was that this duality runs both ways — that matter itself, not just light, should show wave-like behaviour, an idea confirmed by firing electrons through a thin metal film.
What you'll be able to do
Diffraction and interference only make sense if light behaves as a wave; the photoelectric effect only makes sense if light arrives as discrete photon particles. Depending on the experiment, light displays one behaviour or the other — never both in the same measurement — and both models are needed to fully describe it. This is .
In 1924, de Broglie proposed that every moving particle has an associated wavelength related to its momentum. Faster or more massive particles have greater momentum, giving a shorter de Broglie wavelength — which is why the effect is only ever noticeable for very light, fast particles like electrons.
Tip — A larger momentum always gives a SHORTER de Broglie wavelength — this is exactly why electrons show observable wave effects but a thrown ball never does.
Firing a beam of electrons through a thin film of polycrystalline graphite produces a pattern of concentric bright and dark rings on a detecting screen — a diffraction pattern, exactly as X-rays (known waves) produce through the same crystal structure. This is direct experimental evidence that matter genuinely has wave properties.
Increasing the electron beam’s accelerating voltage increases electron speed and momentum, shortening the de Broglie wavelength and producing a smaller, tighter diffraction pattern.
Tip — A higher accelerating voltage → faster electrons → greater momentum → shorter wavelength → LESS diffraction (smaller rings) — the same wavelength-diffraction relationship you’ve already met for light.
Equation recap
Common mistakes to avoid
Key takeaways
Test yourself
Ready to lock in Wave-Particle Duality? Pick a mode and earn XP & Dobloons.