Loading...
A classification should communicate relationships, while a phylogeny proposes an evolutionary history. Evaluate the evidence used instead of treating visible similarity as sufficient.
Video by Cognito. The video’s own board label is retained; follow the specification reference and scope notes on this lesson for assessed content.
Viewing focus: Use the biological species concept with limitations
After watching, attempt these questions before opening the answers. You can also use the written lesson below.
After watching 1: A binomial consists of:
Genus and species names. It provides a shared species naming system.
After watching 2: Which rank is immediately broader than genus in the listed hierarchy?
Family. The sequence includes order, family, genus, species.
What you'll be able to do
The biological species concept groups organisms capable of interbreeding to produce fertile offspring. Courtship behaviour can help members recognise suitable mates and coordinate reproduction, contributing to reproductive isolation between species.
This concept is useful for many sexually reproducing organisms but cannot be applied straightforwardly to fossils, asexual organisms or populations whose reproductive compatibility cannot be tested. Classification therefore also draws on other evidence. A similar appearance alone does not guarantee shared species membership.
A hierarchy can include domain, kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus and species, with increasingly specific groups nested within broader ones. Each named group is a taxon. In a binomial such as Homo sapiens, Homo is the genus and sapiens the specific name; the genus begins with a capital letter and the species name with lowercase.
A phylogenetic classification aims to reflect common ancestry. A branching point on a tree represents a proposed common ancestor, and relatedness depends on the recency of shared ancestry, not on which tip happens to be drawn highest or farthest right. The left-to-right order of tips can often be rotated without changing relationships.
Comparing homologous DNA, RNA or protein sequences can reveal similarities and differences useful for inferring relationships. Comparable regions and adequate sequence length matter. One highly conserved short protein may not distinguish close relatives, while one rapidly evolving region may need careful alignment and analysis.
Immunological comparisons and genome sequencing have revised some groupings based mainly on appearance. Similar features can arise independently through similar selection pressures, so convergent resemblance need not indicate especially recent ancestry. Focus on hierarchy, evidence and the taxonomic systems named by this specification.
Try each question before opening the worked response. Use precise biological terms, connect each cause to its effect, and check units and assumptions when interpreting data.
Common mistakes to avoid
Key takeaways
Check the assessed scope and practical or mathematical requirements.
An external explanation or interactive activity to use alongside the lesson. It may include extension material.
Close the notes and answer from memory. Revisit any explanation you cannot yet reconstruct.
Test yourself
Answer a few questions, then review anything you missed.
Start with the quiz above to check the key ideas. You can also choose another topic from the practice library.