- Home
- Courses
- Edexcel GCSE Chemistry
- Core practical investigations
- CP9.6C: Identifying the Specified Ions
CP9.6C: Identifying the Specified Ions
Use the qualification’s specified ion list and the centre’s approved reagents and methods. Label an unknown and take suitable separate portions for different tests. A reagent added in one test can introduce ions that interfere with a later test, so repeatedly adding every reagent to one tube can make results hard to interpret.
Before you start
- Use your teacher’s tier checklist: this overview can include Higher-only material, and is not a tier-specific revision list.
- Pearson Edexcel separate GCSE Chemistry 1CH0. Preserve the specification’s core-practical reference and any explicitly required subparts.
- Recall cations, anions, precipitation and the difference between observation and inference.
- Use the centre’s approved supervised method, apparatus, heating and disposal arrangements. Written preparation does not replace performing and recording the practical activities.
Watch, pause, try
Video by Malmesbury Education. The demonstration develops the shared testing methods. Its ion set may differ from this qualification; use the board-specific table and anion/gas requirements in the written guide.
Viewing focus: Choose separate portions and appropriate confirmatory tests
After watching, attempt these questions before opening the answers. You can also use the written lesson below.
After watching 1: Why must a white precipitate be followed by appropriate further evidence?
Show answer and reasoning
More than one ion can give a white solid. Use the specified excess-reagent behaviour or a complementary test under controlled conditions.
After watching 2: Why is the choice of acid important before testing for chloride?
Show answer and reasoning
Hydrochloric acid can introduce chloride and undermine the interpretation. Use the specified nitric-acid preparation for the silver-nitrate halide test.
What you'll be able to do
- Choose separate portions and appropriate confirmatory tests
- Interpret flame, gas and precipitation evidence
- Distinguish a supported ion identification from an unjustified unique claim
Plan the sequence and prevent contamination
Use the qualification’s specified ion list and the centre’s approved reagents and methods. Label an unknown and take suitable separate portions for different tests. A reagent added in one test can introduce ions that interfere with a later test, so repeatedly adding every reagent to one tube can make results hard to interpret.
Use clean equipment and a justified comparison or known sample where appropriate. For flame tests, contamination can mask the sample’s characteristic colour. Record the actual flame or precipitate observation before deciding an identity. An unexpected result is a reason to check preparation and controls, not to change the observation to match an expected answer.
Use complementary evidence for cations
Use the cation set in the table for this qualification, with the approved reagent conditions. Flame tests complement precipitation evidence: lithium is crimson/red, sodium yellow, potassium lilac, calcium orange-red and copper blue-green. State the observed colour and avoid contamination that can mask a weaker signal.
A white precipitate alone is not a complete cation identity. Use excess-reagent behaviour and appropriate complementary evidence. Copper(II), iron(II) and iron(III) give different characteristic hydroxide colours. Balanced precipitation equations must conserve atoms and charge; for example, Cu²⁺ + 2OH⁻ → Cu(OH)₂(s).
| Specified cation | NaOH observation in suitable conditions | Additional distinction |
|---|---|---|
| Aluminium, Al³⁺ | White precipitate | Dissolves in suitable excess NaOH |
| Calcium, Ca²⁺ | White precipitate | Does not dissolve in excess NaOH |
| Copper(II), Cu²⁺ | Blue precipitate | Use the specified observation |
| Iron(II), Fe²⁺ | Green precipitate | Use the specified observation |
| Iron(III), Fe³⁺ | Brown precipitate | Use the specified observation |
| Ammonium, NH₄⁺ | Ammonia released with suitable alkaline warming | Damp red litmus turns blue; no smell test |
Keep anion tests and gas tests specific
An acid–carbonate test can release carbon dioxide, which turns limewater cloudy under the appropriate test. Acidified silver nitrate can give white, cream or yellow precipitates with chloride, bromide or iodide respectively. Use the specified acidification and separate portions so another reagent does not supply the ion being sought.
A suitable acidified barium-ion test gives a white sulfate precipitate. A white solid without the reagent and preparation context is not a unique sulfate identification. Match the conclusion to the complete evidence, the qualification’s required tests and possible interferences. Do not substitute an untested ion simply because its salt name seems familiar.
Use dilute nitric acid before the specified silver-nitrate halide test, and the appropriate dilute-acid/barium-ion sulfate method. Adding hydrochloric acid to the chloride-test portion can introduce the ion being sought.
Pearson also requires ammonium and the chemical test for ammonia. In the approved alkaline-warming method, released ammonia turns damp red litmus blue. Do not use direct smelling as the identification method.
Worked applications
Attempt these problems on paper before opening the worked reasoning. Explain your steps as well as giving a final answer.
Example 1An acid-treated sample releases a gas that turns limewater cloudy. What two linked observations support the conclusion?
Example 2A sample gives a white precipitate with sodium hydroxide. Why is that not a unique cation identity?
Common mistakes to avoid
Key takeaways
- You can choose separate portions and appropriate confirmatory tests.
- You can interpret flame, gas and precipitation evidence.
- You can distinguish a supported ion identification from an unjustified unique claim.
Apply it in an exam
Question 1: A sample gives a white precipitate with sodium hydroxide. Why is that not a unique cation identity?
Show answer and reasoning
A further discriminating test is needed.
- Several specified metal ions can give white hydroxide precipitates.
- Use appropriate excess-reagent behaviour, a flame test or other specified evidence.
Explore further
- Edexcel 1CH0 official specification (opens in a new tab)
Check the assessed scope and practical or mathematical requirements.
- Read or explore this topic (opens in a new tab)
An external explanation or interactive activity to use alongside the lesson. It may include extension material.
Return to this tomorrow
Close the notes and answer from memory. Revisit any explanation you cannot yet reconstruct.
- Which observation commonly supports copper(II) in a hydroxide test?
- Why is acidification relevant before suitable anion tests?
Test yourself
Answer a few questions, then review anything you missed.
Keep practising
Start with the quiz above to check the key ideas. You can also choose another topic from the practice library.
Related lessons
All 8 lessons- Same chapterCP2.11: Ink Chromatography and DistillationExplain both required ink-separation methods
- Same chapterCP3.6: Solid Base Addition and pHControl solid-base additions to a fixed acid sample
- Same chapterCP3.17: Hydrated Copper Sulfate CrystalsExplain excess insoluble reactant, filtration and crystallisation