Loading...
OCR expects you to use the laws of indices for — not just the whole-number ones. That phrase is doing a lot of work: it means , and all have to obey the same three rules that does. This lesson builds every one of them out of a single table.
The big picture
Almost nothing in A-Level Pure is written without indices. You will differentiate , integrate , expand , solve with logarithms, and model growth and decay — and each of those assumes you can move fluently between , and without thinking about it. Students who meet a in a calculus question and stall have almost always never rewritten it as . Index fluency is not a topic you finish; it is the notation the rest of the course is written in.
What you'll be able to do
Write out the powers of 2, working downwards:
, , , .
Every step down the list the value — that is, divides by the base. There is nothing special about 2: powers of any base fall by a factor of each time the index drops by one. Keep that single observation in view. Almost every "strange" index rule is just this pattern refusing to stop.
Reading the table upwards gives multiplication, downwards gives division. That symmetry is why the laws come in pairs: multiplying adds indices because it climbs the table, dividing subtracts because it descends.
For positive whole numbers the laws are easy to see by writing the powers out in full. is three s multiplied by two more s, which is five s: the indices . Division cancels matching factors top and bottom, so the indices . And means written down twice and multiplied, giving six s, so the indices .
OCR states these for all rational exponents, so once you have them you are entitled to use them on fractions and negatives too — which is exactly how the rest of this lesson pins those cases down.
Tip — These laws only ever apply to and between powers of the . does not become , and cannot be combined at all.
Go back to the powers of 2 and keep stepping down, halving each time: after comes , then , then . Nothing was decided here — the pattern simply continued, and it landed on 1 at the zero index and on reciprocals below it.
The division law says the same thing more formally. is 1 because anything non-zero over itself is 1, and it is by the law. Both are true, so . Similarly cancels to and equals by the law, so a negative index must mean a reciprocal.
Read the minus sign as an instruction to flip, never as a sign on the answer. is , a positive number.
Notice what was not done: nobody defined to be 1 by decree. The value was forced — it is the only number that keeps the division law true. Extending a rule by insisting the existing pattern survives is a habit worth carrying into the rest of the course.
The power-of-a-power law fixes fractional indices too. Whatever is, squaring it gives . The number that squares to is , so . The same argument with an in place of the 2 gives .
A general fraction then does both jobs: the denominator takes the root, the numerator raises to the power. Take the root first whenever you are working without a calculator — means cubing 27 to 19683 before rooting, whereas is just .
Tip — "Write in the form " is OCR shorthand for "clear every root sign and fraction bar into one index". It is nearly always the first line of a differentiation or integration question.
Think like an examiner
Common misconceptions
The laws of indices
Stretch yourself
Given that , find the exact value of .
Hint — Both 9 and 27 are powers of 3. Rewrite each side as a single power of 3, then compare indices.
Questions students ask
Key takeaways
How this fits the course
Build on
Leads to
Test yourself
Ready to lock in Laws of Indices? Pick a mode and earn XP & Dobloons.
Real past-paper questions on Laws of Indices, marked mark-by-mark. How you do feeds straight into your weak-topic list, so your revision keeps targeting what actually needs work.