Loading...
Once the factor theorem has handed you one factor of a cubic, something has to divide it out. OCR calls this "simple algebraic division", and there are two accepted routes: formal long division, or comparing coefficients. Both are examined; knowing when each is faster is most of the skill.
The big picture
Division is what turns a degree-3 problem into a degree-2 problem, and degree 2 is where all your existing tools live. That reduction is the engine behind solving cubics, sketching their graphs, and — later in the course — splitting a rational function into partial fractions before integrating it. There is also a conceptual payoff: dividing polynomials behaves exactly like dividing whole numbers, quotient and remainder included. Recognising that is the same statement as makes the whole topic feel less like a new procedure.
What you'll be able to do
Dividing by means finding a quotient and a remainder with , where the remainder has lower degree than the divisor.
Dividing by a linear expression therefore always leaves a remainder, because anything of lower degree than 1 is a number. When that constant is zero, the divisor was a factor — which is the factor theorem restated.
Degrees are a free check. Dividing a cubic by a linear expression must leave a quadratic quotient. If your quotient comes out cubic or linear, something has gone wrong before the arithmetic is worth checking.
The layout mirrors numerical long division. At each stage, divide the leading term of what remains by the leading term of the divisor, multiply the divisor by that result, and subtract.
The one non-negotiable is including for missing powers. Dividing means writing ; without the the columns misalign and every later term is wrong.
Tip — Subtraction is where this method goes wrong. Changing both signs of the line below and adding is more reliable than subtracting in place.
Write the answer in the shape you know it must take, with unknown coefficients, then multiply out and match. For a cubic divided by a linear factor: .
Two of the unknowns come immediately. The coefficient forces , and the constant term forces . Only the middle needs an actual comparison, so a cubic division reduces to one small equation.
The unused comparison is a free verification. Having found , and from three of the four coefficients, checking against the fourth confirms the whole division in one line — long division offers nothing equivalent.
When the divisor is not a factor, both methods still work; the leftover constant is the remainder. The result is then written , or equivalently as a quotient plus a fraction.
For comparing coefficients, simply include the remainder as an extra unknown from the start and match as before.
Tip — Cross-check the remainder with the remainder theorem: , matching . Two independent routes agreeing is as close to certainty as exam work gets.
Think like an examiner
Common misconceptions
Division facts
Stretch yourself
When is divided by the remainder is , and is a factor. Find and , then factorise completely.
Hint — Two conditions give two equations. Use the remainder theorem for the first and the factor theorem for the second.
Questions students ask
Key takeaways
How this fits the course
Test yourself
Ready to lock in Algebraic Division? Pick a mode and earn XP & Dobloons.
Real past-paper questions on Algebraic Division, marked mark-by-mark. How you do feeds straight into your weak-topic list, so your revision keeps targeting what actually needs work.