Loading...
A surd is a root that will not come out exactly — , , . OCR asks you to "use and manipulate surds, including rationalising the denominator", and behind that wording is one idea worth taking seriously: is a perfectly good number, and writing instead throws away accuracy you were asked to keep.
The big picture
The instruction "give your answer in exact form" appears throughout A-Level, and it is almost always surds, fractions, or that it is protecting. A circle question that produces wants , not . A trigonometry answer of is the answer, not a step towards one. Once decimals enter, every later line inherits a rounding error and the exact structure — the fact that a length is times something — becomes invisible. Handling surds confidently is what lets you stay exact all the way to the last line.
What you'll be able to do
is 3, so it is not a surd — the root came out exactly. does not, and no decimal will ever capture it perfectly, so it stays as . That is the whole distinction: a is a root whose value is irrational.
The two rules you need follow from indices, since is just . Roots pass through multiplication and division unchanged, which is what makes simplifying possible.
There is deliberately no rule for . Roots do not distribute over addition: , while . If you remember one non-rule from this lesson, make it that one.
To simplify a surd, write the number as (largest square factor) × (rest), then split the root. . Using a smaller square factor is not wrong, only unfinished — reached the same place, but still has work left in it.
Once simplified, surds add and subtract exactly like algebraic terms: and combine to for the same reason and give . Unlike surds simply sit side by side.
Tip — Always simplify before adding. looks like nothing cancels until both are written over — then the whole expression collapses to a single term.
Multiplication is straightforward: multiply the rational parts together and the surd parts together, then simplify. .
Brackets expand exactly as they would in algebra, with doing most of the tidying. That last identity is the engine of the next section, so it is worth saying out loud: a surd multiplied by itself stops being a surd.
Watch what happened to in general: the two middle terms cancel and the square kills the root, leaving — a plain rational number. That is the difference of two squares doing something genuinely useful.
Convention is that a final answer carries no surd on the bottom. For a single-surd denominator, multiply top and bottom by that surd — the bottom becomes rational and the value is unchanged, because you multiplied by 1 in disguise.
For a two-term denominator like , one surd is not enough; you need the , the same expression with the sign between the terms reversed. Multiplying by it triggers the difference of two squares from the previous section and clears the root in one move.
Tip — Only the sign between the two terms changes in the conjugate. The conjugate of is — not , and not .
Think like an examiner
Common misconceptions
Working with surds
Stretch yourself
Express as a single fraction in its simplest form.
Hint — Rather than rationalising each fraction separately, add them over a common denominator first — the denominators are conjugates.
Questions students ask
Key takeaways
How this fits the course
Test yourself
Ready to lock in Surds and Rationalisation? Pick a mode and earn XP & Dobloons.
Real past-paper questions on Surds and Rationalisation, marked mark-by-mark. How you do feeds straight into your weak-topic list, so your revision keeps targeting what actually needs work.