- Home
- Courses
- Edexcel GCSE Physics
- Core practical investigations
- CP5.19P: Surface Coverings and Thermal Transfer
CP5.19P: Surface Coverings and Thermal Transfer
Objects emit infrared radiation according to their temperature and surface properties. A dull black surface is generally a good infrared emitter and absorber compared with a shiny metallic surface in the relevant school comparison. A shiny surface reflects strongly. Do not infer every infrared property from visible colour alone: visible light and infrared are different spectral regions.
Before you start
- Use your teacher’s tier checklist: this overview can include Higher-only material, and is not a tier-specific revision list.
- Pearson Edexcel separate GCSE Physics 1PH0. Use the original core-practical reference and retain every specified subpart; two guides can develop different parts of one core reference.
- Distinguish temperature from thermal-energy transfer and recognise controlled variables.
- Use the centre’s approved supervised method and equipment limits. These notes prepare you to explain and evaluate practical work; they do not replace carrying it out and recording the evidence.
Watch, pause, try
Video by Pearson UK & International Schools. This Pearson demonstration develops the specified surface-covering comparison. Evaluate all transfer pathways when interpreting the covered-container cooling evidence.
Viewing focus: Distinguish emitting, absorbing and reflecting radiation
After watching, attempt these questions before opening the answers. You can also use the written lesson below.
After watching 1: Name two conditions that must be comparable when measuring infrared detector response from different hot surfaces.
Show answer and reasoning
Surface temperature and detector distance/orientation must be comparable; background response and settling time also need consistent treatment.
After watching 2: Why is “the black container lost more heat by radiation” stronger than the cooling data alone justify?
Show answer and reasoning
Temperature change records net effects. Conduction, convection, geometry and covering properties can also affect the result, so evaluate them before isolating radiation.
What you'll be able to do
- Distinguish emitting, absorbing and reflecting radiation
- Compare surfaces using matched geometry and temperature
- Evaluate what a cooling experiment can and cannot isolate
Separate a surface property from its temperature
Objects emit infrared radiation according to their temperature and surface properties. A dull black surface is generally a good infrared emitter and absorber compared with a shiny metallic surface in the relevant school comparison. A shiny surface reflects strongly. Do not infer every infrared property from visible colour alone: visible light and infrared are different spectral regions.
In an emission comparison, keep the surfaces at comparable temperatures and place a suitable detector at the same distance and orientation. A Leslie cube provides different surfaces on a common heated container. Rotate or reposition consistently and allow the sensor to settle. Background readings and changing surface temperature can affect small differences.
Choose an absorption or cooling comparison deliberately
For absorption, comparable surfaces receive radiation from the same source at the same distance and orientation. Compare suitable temperature changes or detector evidence while controlling mass and geometry. A hotter starting sample or a closer source is an alternative explanation for a larger response. Distinguish energy absorbed from energy reflected away.
A covered-container cooling comparison records temperature at fixed times after equal hot-water volumes are added. Keep container geometry, initial temperature, lids, probe positions and surroundings comparable. Different surface coverings can affect radiation, but the water also transfers energy through conduction and convection. A temperature drop is evidence of net cooling, not a direct count of infrared energy emitted.
Use evidence within the apparatus limits
Plot temperature against time, or detector response against surface type, as appropriate. Compare samples over matched intervals and at comparable temperatures. A detector reading may be relative rather than calibrated in watts; do not attach energy units to an arbitrary signal. Repeat and reset the arrangement to assess variation and check for a systematic distance or timing bias.
A good emitter is also a good absorber at a given wavelength under the relevant conditions, but that does not mean its temperature must always be highest. Temperature depends on the balance of incoming and outgoing transfers. A surface can cool faster in one arrangement and warm faster when irradiated in another. State the experiment’s direction of transfer before explaining a result.
CP5.19P: compare at least four coverings
Prepare at least four beakers or test tubes with different coverings, such as different colours or shiny/dull surfaces. Use the same volume of hot water in each, fit lids and record temperatures at fixed times with a thermometer and stopwatch. Match the initial water temperatures and container geometry as closely as practicable and record how coverings and timing are made comparable.
Graph the cooling data and compare matched intervals. The comparison explores the effect of the surface arrangement, but a covering can also change insulation or contact with the surroundings. Explain the role of lids and equal volumes, and distinguish the measured net cooling from an isolated absolute infrared-power determination.
Worked applications
Attempt these problems on paper before opening the worked reasoning. Explain your steps as well as giving a final answer.
Example 1Two equal-volume covered containers both start at 75 °C. After 240 s, one is at 65 °C and the other at 69 °C. Compare the drops and the strength of the radiation inference.
Example 2At matched temperature and detector geometry, a dull surface gives a background-corrected signal of 48 arbitrary units and a shiny surface 12. Find the response ratio and state its limit.
Example 3A sample warms by 3.0 K during a 120 s irradiation period. Another starts hotter and warms by 2.0 K. Why is a surface ranking uncertain?
Common mistakes to avoid
Key takeaways
- You can distinguish emitting, absorbing and reflecting radiation.
- You can compare surfaces using matched geometry and temperature.
- You can evaluate what a cooling experiment can and cannot isolate.
Apply it in an exam
Question 1: A sample warms by 3.0 K during a 120 s irradiation period. Another starts hotter and warms by 2.0 K. Why is a surface ranking uncertain?
Show answer and reasoning
A smaller rise alone does not establish poorer absorption.
- Unequal starting temperatures change outgoing transfers.
- Net temperature rise depends on thermal capacity and both incoming and outgoing transfers.
- Match initial conditions, mass and geometry before isolating a surface effect.
Explore further
- Edexcel 1PH0 official specification (opens in a new tab)
Check the assessed scope and practical or mathematical requirements.
- Read or explore this topic (opens in a new tab)
An external explanation or interactive activity to use alongside the lesson. It may include extension material.
- Pearson GCSE Science core practical guide (opens in a new tab)
Use the separate Physics references and apparatus requirements alongside the current specification.
Return to this tomorrow
Close the notes and answer from memory. Revisit any explanation you cannot yet reconstruct.
- Does a cooling curve measure radiation alone?
- Why can a dull surface both warm and cool faster in different setups?
Test yourself
Answer a few questions, then review anything you missed.
Keep practising
Start with the quiz above to check the key ideas. You can also choose another topic from the practice library.
Related lessons
All 10 lessons- Same chapterCP2.19: Trolley Mass and Ramp AccelerationCalculate acceleration from suitable motion measurements
- Same chapterCP4.17: Ripple-Tank and Metal-Rod Wave MeasurementsChoose apparatus for wavelength, frequency and propagation time
- Same chapterCP5.9: Refraction in a Rectangular Glass BlockTrace incident, reflected and refracted rays