Loading...
A company claims 25% of its customers win a prize. In a sample of 20, nine win. Is the claim wrong, or was the sample just lucky? gives a principled way to decide: assume the claim is true, work out how surprising the evidence would be, and reject the claim only if the evidence is surprising enough.
The big picture
A hypothesis test is an argument by contradiction with a probability threshold. The null hypothesis fixes a parameter at its claimed value; the alternative says how you suspect it differs. You then calculate the probability of a result at least as extreme as the one observed, assuming . If that probability falls below the significance level, the result is too unlikely to blame on chance, and is rejected. OCR tests this with the binomial distribution in Year 1, and with the normal distribution for a sample mean in Year 2. The mathematics is short; what earns the marks is precise language — hypotheses in terms of the parameter, a comparison with the significance level, and a conclusion in context that never claims certainty.
What you'll be able to do
The states the parameter takes the claimed value, e.g. . The states how it might differ: or (one-tailed), or (two-tailed).
The is the observed value, such as the number of successes . The , often 5%, is the probability threshold below which a result is considered too unlikely under .
The is the set of values of the test statistic that would lead to rejecting ; its boundary is the .
Tip — Hypotheses are always about the population parameter ( or ), never about the sample result. Writing "" earns nothing.
Under , . For , calculate ; for , calculate .
If this probability is less than the significance level, reject . Otherwise, do not reject it.
The probability is of "9 ", not "exactly 9". Any single value is fairly unlikely in a spread-out distribution; the question is whether the observed result lies in the extreme tail.
To find a critical region for , find the smallest such that the significance level. The is , usually a little below the nominal level because the binomial is discrete.
For a two-tailed test at 5%, split the significance level: find a critical region in each tail with probability at most 2.5%.
Tip — Show the two probabilities either side of each boundary — one just above and one just below the tail threshold. That is what justifies the critical value.
If , the mean of a random sample of size satisfies . Larger samples give sample means that cluster more tightly around .
To test , calculate (or ), or compare with the critical -value.
Think like an examiner
Common misconceptions
Hypothesis testing
Stretch yourself
A coin is suspected of being biased towards tails. It is tossed 15 times. Using a 5% significance level, find the critical region for a test of against , where is the probability of heads, and state the actual significance level. Then explain what a result of 4 heads would mean.
Hint — Under , . Find the largest with .
Questions students ask
Key takeaways
How this fits the course
Build on
Related
Test yourself
Ready to lock in Hypothesis Testing? Pick a mode and earn XP & Dobloons.
Real past-paper questions on Hypothesis Testing, marked mark-by-mark. How you do feeds straight into your weak-topic list, so your revision keeps targeting what actually needs work.